meetbot.dev

모든 비교 · vs Vexa

meetbot vs Vexa.

Vexa is the only competitor in this set with a fully Apache-2.0 stack — orchestrator, transcription, MCP server, the whole pipeline. If "true OSS today" is your hard requirement, they win, and we tell you so. Where we differ: pricing shape. Their hosted PAYG is $0.30/hr bot + $0.20/hr transcription = $0.50/hr bundled. Ours is $0.30/hr entry rate for the bot-hour with transcription as BYOK today (free pass-through; you pay your provider) — hosted Whisper option ships Q3 2026. We also bring more battle-hardened Meet/Teams adapters today; their hosted dashboard is younger than ours, ours is younger than theirs in places too — call it a mixed bag.

로그인 →가격 섹션으로마지막 확인 2026-05-09

01 · 요약

짧게 말하면.

Vexa을(를) 사용해야 할 때…

  • →You need fully Apache-2.0 source today — every component, no exceptions.
  • →You're building an AI agent and need the MCP server to be part of a fully Apache-2.0 stack.
  • →You want to self-host on bare metal / OpenShift / your own K8s today and don't want any closed-source Docker layer.
  • →You're price-insensitive and prioritise OSS purity.

meetbot을 사용해야 할 때…

  • →You want hosted with an entry-rate bot-hour price and you're fine running BYOK transcription on per-speaker audio (Whisper/Deepgram/AssemblyAI) until our hosted Whisper ships Q3.
  • →You need a more battle-hardened Meet/Teams adapter (Vexa's per-platform reliability is younger).
  • →You want signed webhooks with helper SDKs and customer-visible delivery logs.
  • →You're indifferent on the bot binary's license today — you want the SDK + samples MIT and the API mature.

02 · 사양 표

나란히. 과장 없이.

페이지 푸터의 날짜에 인용된 출처에 대해 확인된 숫자. 무언가 변경되면 PR로 수정해 주세요.

meetbotVexa
OSS license (full stack)MIT (SDKs/CLI/samples/spec); bot closedApache 2.0 (everything)[1]
self-hostM5 (source-available)today (Docker · K8s · OpenShift · bare metal)[2]
hosted bot price$0.30 / hr (bot-hour only)$0.30 / hr[3]
hosted transcriptionBYOK today (free pass-through); hosted Whisper +$0.10/hr at GA (Q3 2026)+$0.20 / hr[4]
bundled hosted $/hr$0.30 + your transcription bill (BYOK) today; $0.40 at GA$0.50
individual plan—$12 / mo (1 concurrent bot)[5]
MCP server—yes (built-in)[6]
interactive bot (TTS speak)M1 (output-audio endpoint)yes (TTS-driven)
platformsMeet, Teams, Zoom Web, Zoom SDK, Webex, Whereby, Jitsi, DiscordMeet, Teams, Zoom
transportswebhook · websocket · RTMPwebhook · websocket
data residency (hosted)Hetzner Falkenstein (DE)self-host: anywhere; hosted: not specified
production maturitypre-launch (zero paying customers today; sample apps + daily smoke tests against real meetings)growing fast, smaller install base than Recall
  1. [1]OSS license (full stack): github.com/Vexa-ai/vexa
  2. [2]self-host: github.com/Vexa-ai/vexa
  3. [3]hosted bot price: vexa.ai/pricing
  4. [4]hosted transcription: vexa.ai/pricing
  5. [5]individual plan: vexa.ai/pricing
  6. [6]MCP server: github.com/Vexa-ai/vexa

03 · 가격 시나리오

계산, 세 가지 방식.

세 가지 사용 지점: 취미가, 스타트업, 규모 있는 회사. 셀별 공식 가시화 — 스프레드시트에 복사하고 자신의 숫자를 넣으세요.

시나리오 1

Hobbyist · 10 hr / mo

월 10시간의 회의 녹화.

meetbot
10 hr × $0.30 = $3.00 (bot-hour only)
$3.00/월
Vexa
10 hr × ($0.30 + $0.20) = $5.00
$5.00/월

Today: meetbot bills the bot-hour only — transcription (if you want it) is BYOK. Or self-host Vexa free on your own box — fixed cost ~$0 + your time. If your time is free, Vexa wins. It rarely is.

시나리오 2

Startup · 1,000 hr / mo

월 1,000시간의 회의 녹화.

meetbot
1,000 hr × $0.30 = $300 (bot-hour) + your transcription bill (BYOK)
$300+/월
Vexa
1,000 hr × $0.50 = $500
$500/월

Today bundled: $300 + ~$100–200 for BYOK transcription via Deepgram/AssemblyAI ≈ $400–500/mo. At GA (hosted Whisper Q3 2026): $400/mo. Self-host Vexa = ~$80/mo Hetzner box + ~10 hr/mo ops time ≈ $280/mo at $20/hr engineer rate.

시나리오 3

Scale · 50,000 hr / mo

월 50,000시간의 회의 녹화.

meetbot
1,000 hr × $0.30 + 9,000 hr × $0.25 + 40,000 hr × $0.20 = $10,550 (bot-hour) + transcription
$10,550+/월
Vexa
50,000 hr × $0.50 = $25,000
$25,000/월

At this scale BYOK transcription approaches its hardware floor (~$200–400/mo for self-hosted Whisper on a couple of Hetzner GPU boxes). Self-host Vexa at this scale = real ops investment (~1 FTE), plus GPU bills for transcription. Probably cheaper in hardware ($/hr) but expensive in headcount.

04 · 그들이 이기는 곳

Vexa이(가) 더 나은 선택인 영역.

이 섹션을 포함하는 이유는 그 대안 — 어디서나 우리가 이긴다고 척하는 것 — 이 부정직하고, 부정직한 비교 페이지가 대부분 읽을 가치가 없는 이유이기 때문입니다.

  • 01Apache-2.0 across the entire stack today. Our bot binary is closed; theirs isn't. If 'no closed-source layers' is a hard procurement criterion, they win.
  • 02MCP server inside a fully Apache-2.0 stack. meetbot also ships @meetbot/mcp-server, but ours is newer and the hosted bot/orchestrator are not fully open source.
  • 03TTS-driven interactive bots are first-class — the bot can speak in the meeting. Ours ships in M1 (output-audio endpoint) but theirs is more developed today.
  • 04OpenShift and bare-metal self-host paths. Our self-host bundle is Docker Compose-first today; Kubernetes/OpenShift remains operator-owned.
  • 05Pricing for very low concurrency: $12/mo for 1 concurrent bot is hard to beat for solo developers who only ever run one meeting at a time.

05 · 우리가 이기는 곳

meetbot이 이기는 곳.

각 줄은 그것을 증명하는 docs 페이지로 링크됩니다. 형용사가 아닌 숫자. 아래 날짜 기준 Vexa의 공개 표면에 대해 출처화되었습니다.

  • 01Cheaper hosted bot-hour. $0.30/hr (us, bot-hour) vs $0.50/hr (Vexa, bundled bot + transcription). At GA — once our hosted Whisper lands Q3 — bundled rate is $0.40/hr (us) vs $0.50/hr (them). Today the gap is BYOK-on-our-side: per-speaker audio piped into Whisper/Deepgram/AssemblyAI on your key, zero meetbot fee on that leg.
    증거: /pricing
  • 02More battle-tested Meet/Teams adapters. We've shipped through Google's April-2026 dual-queue admit screen change with a bot pool model that actually survives it.
    증거: /docs/meet
  • 03Signed webhooks and delivery logs today; Vexa is deeper on realtime WebSocket workflows, while RTMP remains a meetbot roadmap item.
    증거: /docs/transports
  • 04Second-metered billing and a customer dashboard with signed-receipt invoices, API key rotation, retention controls per bot.
    증거: /account
  • 05$5 one-time welcome credit after Stripe billing is linked.
    증거: /pricing

06 · 마이그레이션

전체 전환. 여덟 줄.

같은 형태, 같은 필드, 다른 호스트. Vexa 의 bot 디스패치 호출을 meetbot 호출로 교체하세요. webhook 페이로드는 핸들러가 이미 파싱하는 같은 JSON 형태로 도착합니다.

Vexa (이전)ts
// Vexa (hosted)
const res = await fetch("https://gateway.vexa.ai/bots", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: {
    "X-API-Key": process.env.VEXA_KEY!,
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    platform: "google_meet",
    native_meeting_id: "abc-defg-hij",
    bot_name: "notes",
    language: "en",
  }),
});
meetbot (이후)ts
// meetbot — transcription is BYOK today (hosted Whisper Q3 2026)
const res = await fetch("https://api.meetbot.dev/api/v1/bot", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: {
    Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.MEETBOT_KEY}`,
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    meeting_url: "https://meet.google.com/abc-defg-hij",
    bot_name: "notes",
    // per-speaker audio in your bucket; pipe to your provider
    webhook_url: WEBHOOK_URL,
  }),
});

07 · FAQ

실제로 받는 질문.

Q.If Vexa is fully open source, why use you?
If you're going to self-host, Vexa is a defensible choice today and we say so on this page. Most teams don't end up self-hosting — the operational burden of keeping bot adapters working through monthly Meet/Teams DOM changes is real, and most prefer to pay someone to do it. We're cheaper than their hosted on the bot-hour ($0.30 vs $0.30 + $0.20 transcription), with what we believe is a more battle-tested Meet/Teams adapter today; you should run a real proof-of-concept against both before committing.
Q.Will meetbot open the bot and orchestrator?
The TypeScript and Python SDKs, CLI, MCP server, sample apps, and OpenAPI spec are MIT today; Go and Rust SDKs are planned. The hosted bot and orchestrator images are proprietary today; the self-host path uses published containers. If you need a fully Apache-2.0 stack today, Vexa.
Q.Do you support MCP for AI-agent workflows?
Yes. @meetbot/mcp-server ships for AI-agent workflows. Vexa still wins if you need the MCP server as part of a fully Apache-2.0 stack; meetbot's MCP package is MIT, while the hosted bot/orchestrator are proprietary today.
Q.Can your bot speak in the meeting?
The API shape is POST /api/v1/jobs/:id/output-audio — initially with a pre-recorded WAV upload-and-play, streaming TTS later. Vexa's interactive bot surface is more developed today; we'll close this gap by Q3.
Q.What's the realistic self-host TCO for Vexa?
A 32 GB Hetzner CCX23 ($60–80/mo) handles a few concurrent bots. Add a GPU box if you want hosted transcription (~$200/mo for an RTX 4090). Then add ops time — adapter breakage, container updates, monitoring. At low scale this is cheap; at scale you're either saving real money or hiring a dedicated SRE.
Q.Same wire shape on webhooks?
Mostly. Both deliver a recording manifest URL and HMAC-signed payloads. Field names differ (Vexa uses snake_case + their own event taxonomy). The migration guide diff is one switch statement in your handler.

마지막 확인 2026-05-09 대상 Vexa의 공개 정보. 오류를 발견하셨나요? GitHub에서 수정.

모든 비교로그인 →